
Constitutional Law 1 Quiz 7
Authored by Mighty Kay
Specialty
University
Used 3+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
31 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Under the Dormant Commerce Clause the Pike Balancing Test is used for
discriminatory laws
non-discriminatory laws
state action
federal government regulations
Answer explanation
you determine if it is a violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause by applying the Pike Balancing Test (if the state law burden on interstate commerce outweighs the benefit, the law is deemed unconstitutional)
2.
MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
Privileges and Immunities Clause applies to which of the following:
Choose all that apply.
only applies where a state is discriminating against citizens of other states
only available to individuals who are U.S. citizens
corporations nor aliens can use this clause
protection is limited to situations where a state is discriminating against out of staters concerning a fundamental right and economic activity
can discriminate against an out of stater if necessary to achieve a substantial govmt purpose
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
South Carolina had a statute that required shrimp boats owned by residents to pay a $25 license fee while out-of-staters paid $2500 for the same license fee. The fishermen who brought suit against the South Carolina official Witsell were all residents of GA who asserted this statute was not to conserve shrimp but to exclude non-residents and create a monopoly on the shrimp market in SC.
Does this state statute that discriminates against out-of-staters violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause
Yes
No
Answer explanation
The court explained the purpose of the Privileges and Immunities Clause is to ensure citizens of 1 state enjoy the same privileges of the citizens of another state. So states can not discriminate against citizens of another state just b/c they are not residents. However, if a state has a valid and independent reason for the discrimination and it is reasonably related then the discrimination is permitted.
Here, residents paid $25 for the fishing license and non-residents paid $2500 which was a substantial difference in the same fee. The court rejected the state’s argument that they wanted to conserve the shrimp supply and to eliminate excessive trolling. This reason was not reasonably related to why out-of-state fishermen were charged more for fishing fees.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Concerning the Privileges and Immunities Clause is fishing and hunting a fundamental right
Yes
No
Answer explanation
See Baldwin v. Montana, p. 496, text
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
When a question refers to someone earning a livelihood, they live in another state, and there is discrimination. Which doctrine should you focus on?
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Dormant Commerce Clause
Commerce Clause
Taxing and Spending Clause
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
a criminal statute that punishes actions retroactively, thereby criminalizing conduct that was legal when originally performed (makes the crime retroactively illegal); does not apply to civil cases
Ex-post facto law
Bill of Attainder
discriminatory laws
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
limits Congress and the prohibition and the suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus and it also states that there will be no laws that constitute Bills of Attainder
Article 1, Sections 9-10
Article 3, Section 2
Article 3, Section 3
Answer explanation
Article 1 = Legislative
Article 2 = Executive
Article 3 = Judicial
L.E.J.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?