
Citation Quiz
Authored by Melissa Esterholm
Other
University
Used 11+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
15 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
Plaintiff Veronica Pipes d/b/a Pipe’s Thrifting Company, Plaintiff, sued The United States of America, Defendant.
Pipes v. The United States of America
Pipes v. United States
Pipe’s Thrifting Company v. United States
Pipe’s Thrifting Co. v. United States
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
1.What is the correct short form for the following case. In the immediately preceding sentence of a legal brief, without any intervening cite, you cited to Einstein v. Oppenheimer, 465 U.S. 402 (1941). You now want to cite to pages 405 to 409 of the case.
Einstein v. Oppenheimer at 405-409.
Einstein v Oppenheimer at 405-09.
Id. at 405-09.
Id. at 405-09.
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
Midland National Life Insurance Company, successor to Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant, versus Arlie Bridges, Appellee. This 1994 case is from the Eastland Court of Appeals. It is reported in Volume 889, page 17, of South Western Reporter, Second Series.
Midland Nat'l Insurance Co. v. Brdiges, 889 S.W.2d 17 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1994, writ denied).
Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Bridges, 889 S.W.2d 17 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1994, writ denied).
Midland Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Bridges, 889 S.E.2d 17 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1994, writ denied).
Midland Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Bridges, 889 S.W.2d 17 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1994, writ denied).
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
Shell Oil Company versus Kate Brem, a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2015 and reported in volume 578, beginning on page 197, of the United States Reports.
Shell Oil Co. v. Brem, 578 U.S. 197 (2015).
Shell Oil Co. v. Brem, 578 U.S., 197 (2015).
Shell Oil Company v. Brem, 578 U.S. 197, 2015.
Shell Oil Co. v. Brem, U.S. 578, 197, 2015.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
The People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus Gary Paul Schmidt, Defendant-Appellee. This case was decided on March 6, 1998, by the Court of Appeals of Michigan and is reported in volume 579, page 431, of the North Western Reporter, Second Series.
The People of the State of Mich. v. Schmidt, 579 N.W.2d 431 (1998).
People of Mich. v. Schmidt, 579 N.W.2d 431 (1998).
People v. Schmidt, 579 N.W.2d 431 (1998).
People. v. Gary Schmidt, 579 N.W.2nd 431 (1998).
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
You are citing to Rule 801 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in a motion to suppress. It appears in Title 28 of the United States Code. This rule was published in 2011 and is currently in force.
28 U.S.C. § 801 (2011).
Fed. R. Evid. 801.
28 U.S.C. § 801.
Fed. R. Ev. 801.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
2 mins • 1 pt
In a court filing, you are citing to section 2539 of the Business and Professions Code found in West’s Annotated California Code. The year on the spine is 2015.
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 2539 (West 2015).
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 2539.
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 2539 (2015).
CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § 2539 (West 2015).
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?