Occupiers Liability

Occupiers Liability

Professional Development

14 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

GBG Conversion Class Day 5 Review

GBG Conversion Class Day 5 Review

Professional Development

10 Qs

Orange NH Day 1

Orange NH Day 1

Professional Development

13 Qs

RIL CL SL Defences

RIL CL SL Defences

Professional Development

10 Qs

General

General

Professional Development

10 Qs

Auto Insurance Coverage

Auto Insurance Coverage

Professional Development

15 Qs

Australian Law (Rights) on COCO v THE QUEEN

Australian Law (Rights) on COCO v THE QUEEN

KG - Professional Development

16 Qs

Law - Ch-8  Partnership

Law - Ch-8 Partnership

Professional Development

16 Qs

Going Equipped

Going Equipped

Professional Development

10 Qs

Occupiers Liability

Occupiers Liability

Assessment

Quiz

Other

Professional Development

Medium

Created by

S T

Used 31+ times

FREE Resource

14 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Name the Act that creates a duty towards lawful visitors.

2.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Name the case where it was held that, "When you invite a person into your house to use the staircase, you do not invite him to slide down the bannisters"

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

"There can be more than one occupier of the same premises." True or false?

True

False

Answer explanation

In Wheat v E Lacon both the landlords of a pub and the brewery that owned the pub were counted as occupiers.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In which case were did people have implied consent to cross a field due to repeated visits?

Lowery v Walker

Jolley v Sutton LBC

Robson v Hallett

Harvey v Plymouth City Council

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Select the case where an abandoned boat was an 'allurement'.

Lowery v Walker

Jolley v Sutton LBC

Robson v Hallett

Harvey v Plymouth City Council

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Select the case where there is implied permission to enter premises in order to communicate.

Lowery v Walker

Jolley v Sutton LBC

Robson v Hallett

Harvey v Plymouth City Council

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In which ONE of these cases was the occupier liable for not keeping a child reasonably safe?

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

Phipps v Rochester Corporation

Answer explanation

There was no liability in Phipps as Lord Devlin held that,

“The occupier … is entitled to assume that normally little children will be accompanied by a responsible person …"


Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?