Media Ethics: Should the Accused be Named? Toronto Star

Read the article from the Toronto Star, "Should People Accused and Convicted of Crimes be Named in the News" (attached on Google Classroom). Did you read it?

What is the main argument of Romayne Smith Fullerton regarding the naming of accused and convicted persons in the news?

• Journalists should decide on a case-by-case basis without a guiding principle.

• All accused and convicted persons should be named to ensure transparency.

• Naming should be avoided to protect the privacy of the accused and convicted.

• Naming should be based on what citizens need to know, not want to know.

What sparked a public conversation about naming perpetrators in the media?

• A book release on crime coverage ethics.

• A superior court justice's decision to call a convicted man 'John Doe'.

• A new law regarding media coverage of crimes.

• A public protest against media practices.

Why do Canadian media outlets typically publish names of the convicted?

• To shame those who have gone astray.

• Because of a specific law requiring it.

• To increase their audience and profits.

• To ensure justice is seen to be done.

What historical period does the article reference to argue against secret trials and verdicts?

• The American Colonial period.

• The Star Chamber in 15th century England.

• The French Revolution.

• The Victorian era in England.

What is the job of Canadian media according to the article?

• To decide what the public needs to know.

• To entertain the public with sensational stories.

• To protect the privacy of individuals.

• To keep a watchdog eye on powerful institutions.

How do Dutch journalists typically handle naming persons accused or convicted?

• By not naming them to avoid shaming innocent family members.

• By using their full names to ensure transparency.

• By letting the accused decide if they want to be named.

• By only using their initials after a sentence is passed.

What does the article suggest about the reintegration of convicted individuals to society?

• It's nearly impossible due to media coverage.

• It's easily achieved with community support.

• It's the sole responsibility of the individual.

• It's not affected by media practices.

What comparison does the article make to discuss crime coverage ethics?

• Between different provinces within Canada.

• Between English-speaking and non-English-speaking countries.

• Between Canada and the United States.

• Between Canada and the Netherlands.

What does the article suggest about journalists' responsibility in naming accused or convicted persons?

• To consult with victims' families before deciding.

• To prioritize sensationalism for higher viewership.

• To balance public interest with the potential for public shame.

• To follow the law strictly without considering ethics.