5th amendment supreme court decisions

According to Hurtado vs California, A person MUST receive a Grand Jury in California.

• True

• False

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.8

CCSS.RI.4.8

It is NOT double Jeopardy to charge someone for multiple offenses of selling narcotics to the same person.  

• True

• False

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.8

CCSS.RI.4.8

CCSS.RL.4.5

Self Incrimination is also called

the _________________ Clause

Tags

CCSS.RL.2.6

CCSS.RL.8.3

What is NOT Protected under Self Incrimination of the 5th Amendment?

• Fingerprints

• sobriety test

• Hand writing sample

• all of the above

Miranda V. Arizona

According to Supreme Court Decision, Miranda V. Arizona What is required for police to do when interrogating a suspect?

• Police must throw away any evidence they find without a warrant

• Police must advise suspects of their rights in order to enter it into evidence

• Read them the Bill of Rights

• Make them swear on a bible or the Constitution before testimony

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.1

CCSS.RI.4.8

CCSS.RL.4.5

_______ Rights

"you have the right to remain silent"

Tags

CCSS.RL.2.6

CCSS.RL.8.3

A man answered questions at the scene of a crime. He was not a suspect. He answered the questions from police. They did not read him his rights

Answers before he was read his rights CAN be used in the court of law. 

• Lujan vs. Marshall

• MIranda v Arizona

• Salinas v California

• Salinas vs Texas

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.8

CCSS.RL.4.5

Chambers v. Florida (1940)

 The 40 defendants were held for a week, no lawyer, asked questions with up to 10 officers in the room.  Finally, multiple men confessed to the same crime.

What did the Supreme Court decide about the case?

• They all got trials and were sentenced to death

• all the confessions are legal and they went to prison

• The court found all their confessions were forced and they were inadmissible

• They were given new lawyers, signed new confessions and sent to prison

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.8

CCSS.RL.4.5

Eminent ______

Tags

CCSS.RF.3.3B

CCSS.RF.3.3C

CCSS.RF.3.3D

CCSS.RF.4.3A

CCSS.RF.5.3A

A government CAN take private property and sells it for private development.

What court Case allows for this?

• Salinas v Texas

• Kelo v. City of New London 

• Miranda v Arizona

• Lujan v Galindo

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.1

CCSS.RI.6.8

CCSS.RI.4.8