Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

10th Grade

25 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

game for 4c

game for 4c

1st Grade - Professional Development

24 Qs

Unit 102 - Fundamental Safe Working Practices

Unit 102 - Fundamental Safe Working Practices

9th - 12th Grade

24 Qs

If Statements Part 3

If Statements Part 3

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

CPA MS-Office Hotkeys Quiz

CPA MS-Office Hotkeys Quiz

8th Grade - Professional Development

21 Qs

Employee provident Fund 1952

Employee provident Fund 1952

10th Grade - University

20 Qs

Civil Rights and Liberties

Civil Rights and Liberties

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

School Law

School Law

10th Grade - University

22 Qs

Professional Communication (Veterinary)

Professional Communication (Veterinary)

9th - 12th Grade

26 Qs

Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

Assessment

Quiz

Professional Development

10th Grade

Medium

Created by

Timothy Fisher

Used 29+ times

FREE Resource

25 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court established the principle that police officers may conduct a limited frisk or pat-down of a person for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous. What is this type of encounter commonly known as?

Stop and Frisk

Probable Cause

Search Warrant

Miranda Warning

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In the context of Terry stops, what standard must police officers meet to justify a stop and frisk?

Beyond a reasonable doubt

Preponderance of evidence

Probable cause

Reasonable suspicion

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which case clarified the scope of a Terry frisk, emphasizing that it is limited to a protective pat-down of outer clothing to detect weapons and not a full-scale search for evidence?

Mapp v. Ohio

Arizona v. Gant

Chimel v. California

Minnesota v. Dickerson

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio, what constitutional right was at the center of the decision?

Right to a fair trial

Right to bear arms

Right to remain silent

Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which case established the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine, which excludes evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search or seizure?

Miranda v. Arizona

Weeks v. United States

Terry v. Ohio

Katz v. United States

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In Gardner v. Tennessee, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a confession obtained through psychological coercion was inadmissible. This decision further expanded the protection of which constitutional right?

Right to a jury trial

Right to counsel

Right to remain silent

Right to a speedy trial

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which case established the "Miranda warning" requirement, ensuring that suspects are informed of their rights before custodial interrogations?

Gideon v. Wainwright

Escobedo v. Illinois

Miranda v. Arizona

Crawford v. Washington

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?