Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

10th Grade

25 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

British citizenship

British citizenship

7th - 11th Grade

20 Qs

Foundations of Restaurant Management Chapter 20

Foundations of Restaurant Management Chapter 20

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Photoshop Certification [2, Panels]

Photoshop Certification [2, Panels]

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Tenses - Present forms

Tenses - Present forms

8th Grade - Professional Development

20 Qs

Office Tools - Year 10

Office Tools - Year 10

7th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Summative Porridge Making

Summative Porridge Making

10th Grade

20 Qs

CPA MS-Office Hotkeys Quiz

CPA MS-Office Hotkeys Quiz

8th Grade - Professional Development

21 Qs

Ch. 2 Life Skills

Ch. 2 Life Skills

10th Grade - University

20 Qs

Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

Quiz on Legal Cases and Police Procedures

Assessment

Quiz

Professional Development

10th Grade

Practice Problem

Medium

Created by

Timothy Fisher

Used 29+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

25 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court established the principle that police officers may conduct a limited frisk or pat-down of a person for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous. What is this type of encounter commonly known as?

Stop and Frisk

Probable Cause

Search Warrant

Miranda Warning

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In the context of Terry stops, what standard must police officers meet to justify a stop and frisk?

Beyond a reasonable doubt

Preponderance of evidence

Probable cause

Reasonable suspicion

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which case clarified the scope of a Terry frisk, emphasizing that it is limited to a protective pat-down of outer clothing to detect weapons and not a full-scale search for evidence?

Mapp v. Ohio

Arizona v. Gant

Chimel v. California

Minnesota v. Dickerson

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio, what constitutional right was at the center of the decision?

Right to a fair trial

Right to bear arms

Right to remain silent

Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which case established the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine, which excludes evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search or seizure?

Miranda v. Arizona

Weeks v. United States

Terry v. Ohio

Katz v. United States

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

In Gardner v. Tennessee, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a confession obtained through psychological coercion was inadmissible. This decision further expanded the protection of which constitutional right?

Right to a jury trial

Right to counsel

Right to remain silent

Right to a speedy trial

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which case established the "Miranda warning" requirement, ensuring that suspects are informed of their rights before custodial interrogations?

Gideon v. Wainwright

Escobedo v. Illinois

Miranda v. Arizona

Crawford v. Washington

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?