PEDLE II

The primary focus of assessment compared to evaluation is:

• Learning progress vs. program effectiveness

• Summative vs. formative.

• Quantitative outcomes vs. qualitative processes.

• Learner-centered vs. stakeholder-focused.

• A common challenge in designing effective assessments is:

• Ensuring validity and reliability.

• Providing timely feedback.

• Aligning to objectives.

• All of the above.

When conducting program evaluations, an important consideration is:

• Defining appropriate evaluation criteria

• Minimizing potential evaluation biases

• Analyzing data patterns and trends

• Communicating findings to stakeholders

Formative assessment data is primarily used to:

• Determine final grades or certification

• Inform ongoing teaching and learning

• Evaluate the merit of an entire program

• Demonstrate compliance with standards

How can teachers create a supportive and inclusive classroom environment for all students?

• Favoring certain students over others

• Ignoring students' individual needs and differences

• Implementing strict rules and discipline

• Promoting open communication, respecting diversity, and implementing inclusive teaching strategies

Relevance assessment involves:

• Looking at differences and trade-offs between different priorities or needs.

• How good is my teaching methodology.

• The best way to find out my best way to build better evaluations.

• Analysing any changes in the context to assess the extent to which the intervention can be (or has been) adapted to remain relevant.

The extent to which the intervention achieved, or is expected to achieve, its objectives, and its results, including any differential results across groups is the CORE called :

• Impact

• Sustainability

• Effectiveness

• Coherence

The extent to which the intervention has generated or is expected to generate significant positive or negative, intended or unintended, higher-level effects.

• Impact

• Relevance

• Sustainability

• Efficiency

The compatibility of the intervention with other interventions in the sector or institution.

• Sustainability

• Coherence

• Effectiveness

• Impact

Evaluation EFFICIENCY is:

• The extent to which the net benefits of the intervention continue, or are likely to continue.

• The extent to which the intervention delivers, or is likely to deliver, results in an economic and timely way.

• The compatibility of the intervention with other interventions in the sector or institution.

• The extent to which the intervention has generated or is expected to generate significant positive or negative, intended or unintended, higher-level effects.