Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Concepts

The video tutorial covers section 2.2 on logic and reasoning, building on previous discussions of logical arguments and conditional statements. It introduces conjectures, explaining them as unproven statements based on observations. The tutorial differentiates between inductive reasoning, which involves finding patterns and forming conjectures, and deductive reasoning, which uses facts and logic to form arguments. Examples illustrate both reasoning types, and interactive problems help apply these skills. The concept of counterexamples is explained, showing how a single counterexample can disprove a conjecture. Finally, the laws of logic, including the law of detachment and syllogism, are explored to deepen understanding of deductive reasoning.

What is a conjecture also known as?

• A proven statement

• An observation

• A hypothesis

• A fact

Which type of reasoning involves finding a pattern in specific cases and then writing a conjecture for the general case?

• Deductive reasoning

• Logical reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

• Hypothetical reasoning

Tags

CCSS.HSS.CP.A.5

What does deductive reasoning use to form a logical argument?

• Experiments and trials

• Observations and patterns

• Facts, definitions, and accepted properties

• Hypotheses and conjectures

In the example of Mia coming to class late with uncombed hair, what type of reasoning is used to conclude that Mia overslept?

• Logical reasoning

• Hypothetical reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

• Deductive reasoning

If a number ends in 0 or 5, it is divisible by 5. What type of reasoning is this?

• Hypothetical reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

• Deductive reasoning

• Logical reasoning

What is a counterexample used for?

• To prove a conjecture

• To verify a pattern

• To disprove a conjecture

• To create a new hypothesis

What must be true for a counterexample to be valid?

• The 'then' part must be true

• The 'if' part must be true and the 'then' part must be false

• Both parts must be false

• The 'if' part must be false

What does the law of detachment state?

• If the hypothesis is false, then the conclusion is also false

• If both the hypothesis and conclusion are true, then the statement is false

• If the hypothesis of a true conditional statement is true, then the conclusion is also true

• If the conclusion of a true conditional statement is true, then the hypothesis is also true

What is another name for the law of syllogism?

• The conclusion rule

• The hypothesis rule

• The chain rule

• The detachment rule

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

In the law of syllogism, if 'If P then Q' and 'If Q then R' are true, what can be concluded?

• If Q then P

• If P then Q

• If R then P

• If P then R