Conflict Resolution

Jordan insisted that their proposal be adopted, refusing to consider alternatives during the meeting.

• Collaborating

• Avoiding

• Competing

• Accommodating

Answer explanation

Jordan's insistence on adopting their proposal and refusal to consider alternatives indicates a competitive approach, prioritizing their own position over collaboration or accommodation.

Priya and Noah brainstormed together to find a solution that satisfied both of their needs for project deadlines.

• Compromising

• Collaborating

• Avoiding

• Competing

Answer explanation

Priya and Noah worked together to find a solution that met both their needs, which exemplifies collaborating. This approach focuses on teamwork and mutual benefit, unlike compromising, avoiding, or competing.

Chris and Jamie decided to split the responsibilities evenly after neither wanted to take full control of the project.

• Compromising

• Competing

• Accommodating

• Avoiding

Answer explanation

Chris and Jamie chose to split responsibilities evenly, indicating they reached a mutual agreement. This reflects compromising, where both parties give up some control to achieve a balanced solution.

Rather than discussing the argument, Sam avoided seeing their roommate for days.

• Competing

• Avoiding

• Collaborating

• Compromising

Answer explanation

Sam's choice to avoid their roommate indicates a strategy of avoiding conflict rather than engaging in discussion. This aligns with the answer 'Avoiding', as they chose not to confront the argument directly.

To keep the peace, Jenny agreed to follow Sam's plan, even though she had a different idea.

• Collaborating

• Accommodating

• Compromising

• Competing

Answer explanation

Jenny chose to accommodate Sam's plan to maintain peace, indicating she prioritized his needs over her own ideas. This aligns with the definition of accommodating, where one party yields to another's preferences.

Alex and Sarah both gave up one of their preferred weekend activities to make time for each other's plans.

• Competing

• Collaborating

• Accommodating

• Compromising

Answer explanation

Alex and Sarah made sacrifices by giving up their preferred activities to accommodate each other's plans. This mutual adjustment exemplifies compromising, where both parties find a middle ground.

Michael decided to stay silent when his colleague made a mistake instead of confronting him about it.

• Avoiding

• Compromising

Answer explanation

Michael's choice to remain silent indicates he is avoiding confrontation rather than addressing the mistake directly. This behavior aligns with the concept of avoiding, as he is not engaging with the issue.

Sofia and her teammate merged their ideas into a new concept that both felt improved their presentation.

• Compromising

• Collaborating

• Accommodating

• Competing

Answer explanation

Sofia and her teammate merged their ideas, which indicates they worked together to create a better concept. This process of combining efforts and ideas is best described as collaborating, rather than compromising, accommodating, or competing.

Sara demanded the promotion, even though her colleague felt equally qualified.

• Competing

• Collaborating

• Accommodating

• Avoiding

Answer explanation

Sara's demand for promotion indicates a competitive approach, prioritizing her own interests over her colleague's feelings of equal qualification. This behavior exemplifies the competing conflict style.

Carla agreed to take on extra work so her teammate could leave early, despite her own busy schedule.

• Avoiding

• Accommodating

• Competing

• Compromising

Answer explanation

Carla's decision to take on extra work for her teammate shows she is prioritizing others' needs over her own, which aligns with the accommodating style of conflict resolution. This choice reflects a willingness to support her teammate.