F24 - Negligence - Duty by Relationship

Licensees:

• Have permission to be on the property, but are not there for a business purpose.
• Don't have permission to be on the property.
• Have permission to be on the property, and are there for a business purpose.
• Must be an employee
• Must be acting within the scope of their authority

Trespassers:

• Have permission to be on the property, but are not there for a business purpose.
• Don't have permission to be on the property.
• Have permission to be on the property, and are there for a business purpose.
• Must be an employee
• Must be acting within the scope of their authority

Invitees:

• Have permission to be on the property, but are not there for a business purpose.
• Don't have permission to be on the property.
• Have permission to be on the property, and are there for a business purpose.
• Must be an employee
• Must be acting within the scope of their authority

For respondent superior to apply, the torfeasor must:

• Have permission to be on the property, but are not there for a business purpose.
• Not have permission to be on the property.
• Have permission to be on the property, and are there for a business purpose.
• Be an employee
• Be acting within the scope of their authority

Which of these is NOT a true statement about the general duty that a property owner owes to a trespasser:

• They can deliberately injure the trespasser to protect themselves
• They can deliberately injure the trespasser to protect their property
• They don't have any duty to look for dangers
• They don't have any duty to reduce dangers
• They don't have any duty to warn about dangers

Which of these are true statements about the special duty that a property owner owes to a trespasser, if the attractive nuisance doctrine applies:

• They don't have any duty to inspect for dangers
• They don't have any duty to reduce dangers
• They don't have any duty to warn about dangers
• All of these
• None of these

Which of these are true statements about the special duty that a property owner owes to a trespasser, if the attractive nuisance doctrine applies:

• They have to make a reasonable inspection to find dangers
• They have to do what a reasonable person would do to reduce dangers
• They have to do what a reasonable person would do to warn about dangers
• All of these
• None of these

Which of these are true statements about the general duty that a property owner owes to a trespasser:

• They have a duty to inspect for dangers
• They have a duty to reduce dangers
• They have a duty to warn about dangers
• All of these
• None of these

Which of these are true statements about the special duty that a property owner owes to a trespasser, if the known trespasser doctrine applies:

• They have a duty to inspect for dangers
• They have a duty to reduce dangers
• They have a duty to warn about dangers
• All of these
• None of these

An employer can be liable for which of these acts, if they are committed by an employee in the scope of employment:

• Intentional torts
• Neglgigence
• Acts that the employer prohibits
• Driving to or from work