Understanding the Impact of 26/11

The transcript discusses the impact of the 26/11 attacks on India's perception of terrorism, highlighting the vulnerability of major cities like Mumbai. It explores the security concerns and India's mature response, avoiding military retaliation. The text details civic actions, such as public interest litigation for police reform, and the increased cost of doing business in India due to perceived risks. Despite this, global perception remains positive, with significant international support, particularly from the West, demonstrating solidarity with India.

What was the initial perception of terrorism in India before the 26/11 attacks?

• A global phenomenon

• An isolated incident

• A domestic issue

• A cross-border problem centered around Kashmir

What did the 26/11 attacks reveal about Mumbai?

• It had no impact on global attention

• It was vulnerable and a soft target

• It was a well-protected city

• It was the only city at risk

What is the speaker's view on the security situation on India's western border?

• It is deteriorating

• It is stable

• It is irrelevant

• It is improving

How did India respond to the 26/11 attacks?

• By launching military strikes

• By filing a public interest litigation

• By ignoring the incident

• By seeking international sanctions

What was the purpose of the public interest litigation filed by citizens?

• To demand military action

• To seek police reforms

• To close borders

• To increase taxes

What was the main goal of the initiative taken by the speaker and others?

• To retaliate against terrorists

• To increase business costs

• To find a backward-looking solution

• To promote positive action and police reform

How did the 26/11 attacks affect the cost of doing business in India?

• It was unaffected

• It increased due to terrorist risks

• It remained the same

• It decreased significantly

What was the international response to the 26/11 attacks?

• Demonstration of solidarity

• Withdrawal of business

• Isolation of India

• Increased sanctions

What did the American Bar Association do in response to the 26/11 attacks?

• Cancelled their trip to India

• Demonstrated solidarity by visiting Mumbai

• Imposed legal sanctions

• Ignored the incident

What is the global perception of terrorism's impact?

• It is a global phenomenon

• It is confined to India

• It is not a business consideration

• It only affects Europe