People and Peace Not Profits and War Rhetorical Analysis
Authored by Thomas Walters
English
12th Grade
CCSS covered
Used 1+ times
AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
15 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Analyze how Shirley Chisholm's choice to present herself "as a teacher, and as a woman" rather than emphasizing her position as a Congresswoman impacts her ethos in the speech.
It diminishes her authority and makes her argument less credible.
It aligns her with the everyday experiences of her audience, enhancing her credibility.
It distracts from her main argument about the Vietnam War.
It emphasizes her lack of experience in political matters.
Tags
CCSS.RI.11-12.5
CCSS.RI.9-10.5
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Evaluate the effectiveness of Chisholm's use of contrasts (e.g., "weapons vs. children") in her argument. What is the strategic purpose of these contrasts?
To confuse the audience with unrelated comparisons.
To highlight the inequities in government spending priorities.
To emphasize the importance of military spending.
To suggest that education is less important than defense.
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What reasoning does Chisholm use to argue against the continuation of the Vietnam War, and how does it reflect her strategic thinking?
She argues that the war is popular and should continue, reflecting a lack of strategic thinking.
She suggests that the war is necessary for national security, showing strategic alignment with the administration.
She argues that domestic issues like education and poverty are more pressing, using evidence of federal budget allocations.
She claims that the war is a distraction from international diplomacy efforts.
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RL.11-12.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
How does Chisholm's reference to President Nixon's previous statements serve her argument strategically?
It undermines her argument by showing inconsistency.
It strengthens her argument by holding Nixon accountable to his promises.
It distracts from her main point about education funding.
It suggests that Nixon's policies are irrelevant to her argument.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
In what way does Chisholm's tone contribute to the urgency of her message?
Her tone is dismissive, which reduces the urgency of her message.
Her tone is sarcastic, which confuses the audience about the urgency.
Her tone is urgent and idealistic, which emphasizes the need for immediate action.
Her tone is indifferent, which downplays the importance of her message.
Tags
CCSS.RL.11-12.4
CCSS.RL.6.4
CCSS.RL.7.4
CCSS.RL.8.4
CCSS.RL.9-10.4
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What strategic reasoning does Chisholm use to justify her decision to vote "No" on defense funding bills?
She believes that defense spending is the only way to ensure national security.
She argues that reallocating funds to social programs will better serve the American people.
She thinks that defense spending is already too low.
She wants to increase taxes to fund both defense and social programs.
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RL.11-12.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
How does Chisholm's strategic use of historical references, such as quoting Calvin Coolidge, enhance her argument?
It weakens her argument by focusing on outdated policies.
It strengthens her argument by showing a historical pattern of misplaced priorities.
It distracts from her main point about the Vietnam War.
It suggests that past presidents were more effective than the current administration.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
Continue with Google
Continue with Email
Continue with Classlink
Continue with Clever
or continue with
Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?
