Understanding Contextualization in Debates

What does contextualization mean in a debate?

• Making your argument sound more exciting through use of context limit

• Explaining why your argument is important by connecting it to the real world.

• Using big words to impress the judge and grow the argument with extra detail.

• Asking the judge to agree with you because your argument is more framed.

Why is contextualization important in debates?

• It helps the judge understand why your argument matters.

• It shows that you can memorize facts and stats of the argument.

• It makes your speech longer and more detailed through understanding.

• It helps your opponents agree with your points and evidence.

Which of the following is an example of contextualization?

• "Homework causes stress and reduces family time because it is extra difficult for you."

• "In countries with high stress levels among students, banning homework can improve mental health, family relationships."

• "Students dislike homework because it’s boring and often feel that it lacks the entertainment value they seek."

• "Homework takes 2-3 hours every evening and can limit time to play with friends."

What should you include in good contextualization?

• A detailed description of the argument that explains your reasoning.

• A random or anecdotal story that makes your point sound interesting.

• A real-world example or reason why your argument is important.

• An emotional appeal to make the judge feel connected to the argument.

If you say, "In countries with rising hate crimes, hate speech laws can protect vulnerable groups," what are you doing?

• Stating your argument without context.

• Using evidence and extra reasoning.

• Contextualizing your argument.

• Asking the judge to vote for you.

What question does contextualization answer in a debate?

• "What is your argument and reasoning?"

• "Why is your argument important?"

• "How many points do you have?"

• "Who is the beneficiary or stakeholder"

When contextualizing an argument, what should you focus on?

• Making your argument sound clever and more developed.

• Explaining how your argument applies to real-world situations.

• Adding extra facts or layers to make your argument stronger.

• Asking the judge to imagine your argument is true in their world.

Which of these is NOT an example of contextualization?

• "Hate speech online can incite violence in the real world."

• "In countries where hate speech is common, people often feel unsafe."

• "Many people believe free speech is more important than banning hate speech."

• "In countries with rising hate crimes, banning hate speech online helps reduce harm."

What does contextualization help the judge understand?

• The technical details of your argument and argumentation style.

• Why your argument matters in specific situations.

• How many arguments your team has in the team split.

• How good you are at speaking and presenting the point.

If your argument is, "Freedom of speech allows people to express their opinions," how would you contextualize it?

• "This is an important right for everyone to have, especially if they feel unheard."

• "In countries with strong democracies, freedom of speech ensures citizens can challenge their governments."

• "Free speech means people can say whatever they want and however they want to say it, regardless."

• "Many people support free speech all over the world, as it is a common perspective."