Conclusions in Geometry

Can the triangles be proven congruent?  If so, how?

• ASA

• Cannot be proven congruent

• SAS

• SSS

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What is reason #1?

• Reflexive Postulate

• An angle bisector gives two congruent angles

• ASA

• Given

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Given: <1 and <2 are a linear pair. Conclusion: m<1 + m<2 = 180. What is the reason that allows you to draw that conclusion?

• Angle addition postulate

• Definition of straight angle

• Linear Pair Postulate

• Definition of supplementary

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5

Given: AB is the segment bisector of PQ. What conclusion can you draw?

• PF = QF

• F is the midpoint of PQ

• m<PFA = m<QFA

• <PFQ is a straight angle

Tags

CCSS.HSG.CO.C.10

• <ABC is not an acute angle

• <ABC is supplementary to another angle

• <ABC is a straight angle

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5

What is the missing statement in the proof?

• Addition property

• Segment Addition Postulate

• Substitution property

• Transitive property

When trying to prove two angles are supplementary, what must you show in your proof?

• that the angles are equal

• that the angles add up to 180 degrees

• that the angles are a linear pair

• that the angles are right angles

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5

What is the length of IH

• IH = 8

• IH = 4

• x = 2

• x = -2

Answer explanation

Tags

G.PL.1

what is the length of BD

Tags

G.PL.1

what is the length of TS

Tags

G.PL.1