Geometry Proofs Congruence

• Congruent by ASA

• Congruent by SAS

• Congruent by SSS

• Not Necessarily Congruent

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

• Congruent by ASA

• Congruent by SAS

• Congruent by SSS

• Not Necessarily Congruent

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

In the given proof, what are the reasons for step 1 and 2?

• Angles that form a linear pair are supplementary.

• Substitution

• Reflexive Property of Congruence

• Angles of equal measure are congruent.

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5

In the given proof, what is the reason for step 1?

• Angles that form a linear pair are supplementary.

• Angles of Equal Measure are Congruent

• Reflexive Property of Congruence

• Definition of a Perpendicular Bisector

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

In the given proof, what is the statement for step 2?

Tags

CCSS.HSG.CO.C.9

In the given proof, what is the reason for step 2?

• Alternate Exterior Angle are Congruent

• Reflexive Property of Congruence

• Angles that form a linear pair are supplementary.

• Alternate Interior Angles are Congruent.

Tags

CCSS.HSG.CO.C.11

Why are these 2 triangles congruent, based on your proof?

• ASA

• SAS

• SSS

• Hypotenuse Leg Thm

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Since segment BD is part of both triangles, it is congruent to itself, what do we call this?

• Substitution

• Commutative

• Reflexive

• CPCTC

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Why are these 2 triangles congruent according to your proof?

• ASA

• SAS

• SSS

• Cannot be determined

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

By what reasoning are the two triangles congruent?

• SSS

• SAS

• ASA

• The triangles are not congruent.

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5