Analyzing Multiple Accounts of the Same Topic

How can bias impact the analysis of multiple accounts of the same event or topic?

• It has no impact on the analysis of the accounts

• It can lead to a balanced interpretation of the accounts

• It can lead to a more accurate analysis of the accounts

• It can lead to a skewed interpretation of the accounts, leading to inaccurate analysis.

What are some ways to address bias when analyzing multiple accounts of the same event or topic?

• Ignore the source and focus on the most detailed account

• Consider the source of the information and look for corroborating evidence

• Disregard any conflicting evidence and only focus on the most popular account

• Only consider the accounts that align with your preconceived notions

Which of the following is correct when comparing the two passages?

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator was jealous that his neighbors got to see the Rocky Mountains, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator was struggling with whether or not he wanted to go on the trail.

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator was absolutely certain that he didn’t want to go on the trail, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator was absolutely certain that he wanted to go on the trail.

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator was having a hard time making up his mind about whether to go on the trail, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator couldn’t wait to go on the Oregon Trail.

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator didn’t know whether or not to go look for gold in California, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator just wanted to leave Pennsylvania so he didn’t have to go to school anymore.

According to the text, which of the following statements is true when comparing these two passages?

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator wasn’t scared about crossing any rivers because he knew everything about making a wagon into a boat, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator was excited to ride horses on the trail.

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator was a great hunter and could get buffalo meat for his entire family, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator didn’t want to leave because he loved school.

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator thought for a long time about whether or not to go on the Oregon Trail, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator was jealous of the other kids who already got to go.

• In the passage, The Difficult Decision, the narrator thought he was going to get bored on the trail, and in the passage, The Excitement of the Trail, the narrator was worried about someone in his family getting sick and dying.

What do both of these passages have in common?

• Both passages are about getting free land out west

• Both passages are about striking gold in California

• In both passages, the narrator is excited about riding horses

• Both passages are about the Oregon Trail

Which is true about both passages?

• In both passages, Ms. Theret says the trail is dangerous.

• In both passages, it says the neighbors left to go west.

• In both passages, the narrator is excited about riding a horse.

• In both passages, the narrator can’t wait to be rich.

Why would someone want to know several perspectives on one topic?

• to see if there is new or different information

• to see if new facts are presented

• to get multiple viewpoints

• all of the above

What is the primary benefit of analyzing multiple accounts of the same topic?

• It provides a single perspective.

• It helps in understanding different viewpoints.

• It simplifies the information.

• It eliminates the need for further research.

Which of the following is a potential challenge when analyzing multiple accounts of the same topic?

• Finding a common theme.

• Identifying bias in each account.

• Understanding the main idea.

• Summarizing the accounts.

How can one ensure objectivity when comparing multiple accounts of the same event?

• By focusing on the most popular account.

• By considering the context and source of each account.

• By ignoring conflicting information.

• By choosing the account that aligns with personal beliefs.