Search Header Logo

Evaluation of Voluntary Euthanasia Debate

Authored by Melbourne ILSC

Other

12th Grade

Used 1+ times

Evaluation of Voluntary Euthanasia Debate
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

8 questions

Show all answers

1.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What argument/side of debate has the writer presented in the first argumentative paragraph?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

valid objections to legalising voluntary euthanasia

2.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

How many supporting ideas has the writer presented in the first argumentative paragraph?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

Two (role of doctors and role of families in terminally-ill patients’ lives)

3.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What seems to be the writer’s position on the argument/side of debate presented in the first argumentative paragraph?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

The writer has stated in the topic sentence that “There are a number of valid objections to legalising voluntary euthanasia”, so the writer’s position is most likely partial agreement.

4.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

Has the writer evaluated each supporting idea for the argument, or have they presented a general evaluation of the argument as a whole in the first evaluative paragraph?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

The former (each supporting idea)

5.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

Has the writer presented more strengths or weaknesses for the argument in the first evaluative paragraph? Why?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

The writer has presented more strengths for the argument but under certain conditions, which further gives away the writer’s partial agreement with the argument.

6.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What language of argumentation is repeatedly used in the 2 evaluation paragraphs? Why?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

a combination of problematizing and factual language in the paragraph

7.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What is the writer’s position on the question of whether voluntary euthanasia should be legalised in the second set of argument paragraphs? How has the writer made their position on the question clear?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

Fully agree with one side to the debate (i.e., V.E. should be legalised). Use of problematising language in Argument Paragraph 1. Use of factual language in Argument Paragraph 2. Clear topic sentence in the evaluation paragraph restating the writer’s position for legalising V.E.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?