Filosofía de la ciencia

Filosofía de la ciencia

University

11 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Intuitive as A Source of Knowledge

Intuitive as A Source of Knowledge

University

6 Qs

IPHP L1.1 12 HUMSS

IPHP L1.1 12 HUMSS

12th Grade - University

15 Qs

Argumentative Fallacies and Persuasive Techniques

Argumentative Fallacies and Persuasive Techniques

9th Grade - University

11 Qs

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

University

10 Qs

Merits and Demerits of Realism: True or False

Merits and Demerits of Realism: True or False

University

10 Qs

Idealism

Idealism

University - Professional Development

10 Qs

Utilitarianism Quiz

Utilitarianism Quiz

University

10 Qs

Chapter 1: Introduction to Philosophy

Chapter 1: Introduction to Philosophy

University

10 Qs

Filosofía de la ciencia

Filosofía de la ciencia

Assessment

Quiz

Philosophy

University

Medium

Created by

Leonides García

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

11 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

1. What is the main argument the author presents regarding the objectivity of science?

A) Objectivity in science is solely the result of applying nonarbitrary and impartial criteria.

B) The objectivity of science is secured by the social character of inquiry.

C) Scientific objectivity stems from distancing human values from nature completely.

D) The modern view of objectivity relies only on scientific realism and empirical data.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

2. What do scientists typically mean when they refer to the “objectivity of data”?

A) That data should always align with theoretical expectations.

B) That data has been obtained properly and justifies reliance on it.

C) That data is always free from human interpretation or bias.

D) That data must come from instruments built in the 21st century.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

3. Why does the author argue that the objectivity of data must be qualified?

A) Because instruments often malfunction in controlled environments.

B) Because data covariance doesn’t guarantee an unmediated view of reality.

C) Because data obtained by scientists is always flawed.

D) Because objectivity is only relevant to historical analysis.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

4. What issue does the author highlight in the debate over the nature of science?

A) That scientific practice should reject historical context.

B) That science must always be guided by strict logical rules.

C) That participants often talk past one another without addressing shared concerns.

D) That science cannot be studied through either logical or historical methods.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

5. What does the author propose as the aim of their analysis?

A) To offer a complete and final theory of scientific knowledge.

B) To provide a framework that allows epistemologists and historians to reveal the standards and contexts shaping science.

C) To replace empirical methods with purely normative ones.

D) To prove the superiority of logical positivism over historical critique.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

6. According to the author, what secures the objectivity of science?

A) Its focus on empirical experimentation alone.

B) The social character of inquiry.

C) The use of advanced technological instruments.

D) The logical consistency of scientific theories.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

7. What does one sense of objectivity in science involve, according to the text?

A) The detachment of human needs from the scientific process.

B) The belief that science provides an accurate description of the natural world.

C) The dismissal of subjective reasoning.

D) The reliance solely on mathematics and logic.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?