Thinking and Learning

Thinking and Learning

11th Grade

34 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Los reinos cristianos

Los reinos cristianos

9th - 12th Grade

29 Qs

SOAL LATIHAN PEDAGOGIK 1

SOAL LATIHAN PEDAGOGIK 1

KG - Professional Development

30 Qs

Introducing New Market Offerings

Introducing New Market Offerings

University

30 Qs

CTET/TET EDUCATION

CTET/TET EDUCATION

University

30 Qs

MID GASAL PKN XI TP.23/24

MID GASAL PKN XI TP.23/24

11th Grade

31 Qs

A Viagem dos 100 passos

A Viagem dos 100 passos

10th - 11th Grade

29 Qs

ULANGAN HARIAN 1 KELAS XII

ULANGAN HARIAN 1 KELAS XII

12th Grade

30 Qs

The four realms of earth

The four realms of earth

5th - 11th Grade

30 Qs

Thinking and Learning

Thinking and Learning

Assessment

Quiz

Education

11th Grade

Practice Problem

Medium

Created by

Chelsea Chelsea

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

34 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What cognitive bias is demonstrated in Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Anchoring bias is best illustrated when:

A choice is framed in terms of losses

People seek evidence that confirms what they already believe

A decision is influenced by the first piece of information given

A person avoids risk when outcomes are described as gains

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main experimental manipulation in Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

Framing the crime as more or less severe

Telling judges the crime occurred in a different jurisdiction

Varying the sentence demanded by the prosecutor (anchor)

Changing the guilt verdict

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What was the main finding of Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

Judges’ sentences shifted toward the sentencing demand, even when it was extreme

Judges’ sentences were unaffected by the prosecutor’s request

Judges consistently gave lower sentences than both anchors suggested

Judges always gave harsher sentences when the crime description was more emotional

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the anchoring effect in this study particularly concerning?

Because it proves that prosecutors always exaggerate sentence demands

Because it shows that judges are deliberately biased toward prosecutors

Because it shows that expert decision-makers can be unconsciously swayed by irrelevant numbers

Because it suggests that sentencing laws are fundamentally inconsistent

6.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

The way information is presented can influence decisions. For example, people are more likely to agree to a medical treatment when it is described as having a 90% survival rate rather than a 10% mortality rate. This illustrates the __________.

7.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

When a teacher believes that girls are better at languages, they may pay closer attention when female students excel in English but overlook male students who perform equally well. This is an example of __________.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?