Thinking and Learning

Thinking and Learning

11th Grade

34 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Unang Digmaang Pandaigdig Quiz

Unang Digmaang Pandaigdig Quiz

9th Grade - University

29 Qs

30 markah Kuiz RBT Tingkatan 1

30 markah Kuiz RBT Tingkatan 1

6th Grade - University

30 Qs

Chapter 1 Test - Intro to Chess

Chapter 1 Test - Intro to Chess

6th Grade - University

30 Qs

ARN- Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos

ARN- Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos

7th - 12th Grade

30 Qs

Prueba de hiragana

Prueba de hiragana

1st - 12th Grade

34 Qs

L'Halloween et la Toussaint

L'Halloween et la Toussaint

9th - 12th Grade

30 Qs

because of winn-dixie chapter 21-22

because of winn-dixie chapter 21-22

1st - 12th Grade

30 Qs

POSESIVOS - A2

POSESIVOS - A2

1st Grade - University

33 Qs

Thinking and Learning

Thinking and Learning

Assessment

Quiz

Education

11th Grade

Practice Problem

Medium

Created by

Chelsea Chelsea

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

34 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What cognitive bias is demonstrated in Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Anchoring bias is best illustrated when:

A choice is framed in terms of losses

People seek evidence that confirms what they already believe

A decision is influenced by the first piece of information given

A person avoids risk when outcomes are described as gains

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main experimental manipulation in Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

Framing the crime as more or less severe

Telling judges the crime occurred in a different jurisdiction

Varying the sentence demanded by the prosecutor (anchor)

Changing the guilt verdict

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What was the main finding of Englich & Mussweiler (2001)?

Judges’ sentences shifted toward the sentencing demand, even when it was extreme

Judges’ sentences were unaffected by the prosecutor’s request

Judges consistently gave lower sentences than both anchors suggested

Judges always gave harsher sentences when the crime description was more emotional

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the anchoring effect in this study particularly concerning?

Because it proves that prosecutors always exaggerate sentence demands

Because it shows that judges are deliberately biased toward prosecutors

Because it shows that expert decision-makers can be unconsciously swayed by irrelevant numbers

Because it suggests that sentencing laws are fundamentally inconsistent

6.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

The way information is presented can influence decisions. For example, people are more likely to agree to a medical treatment when it is described as having a 90% survival rate rather than a 10% mortality rate. This illustrates the __________.

7.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

When a teacher believes that girls are better at languages, they may pay closer attention when female students excel in English but overlook male students who perform equally well. This is an example of __________.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?