Scottish Legal System Changes

What significant change has recently occurred in the Scottish legal system?

• Introduction of a new type of jury

• Scrapping of the "not proven" verdict

• Mandatory life sentences for all crimes

• Abolition of jury trials

For how many years has Scotland had a unique legal position with two acquittal verdicts?

• 50 years

• 100 years

• 300 years

• 500 years

What were the two types of acquittal verdicts in Scotland before the recent change?

• Guilty and Not Guilty

• Proven and Not Proven

• Not Proven and Not Guilty

• Acquitted and Convicted

Why did some people interpret the "not proven" verdict differently from "not guilty"?

• It meant the jury believed the person was innocent.

• It signaled the jury thought the person committed the act but lacked full evidence.

• It was a way to delay the trial.

• It was used only for minor offenses.

Who led the campaign to scrap the "not proven" verdict due to its perceived unfairness?

• Legal professionals

• Government officials

• Accused individuals and their families

• Survivors of sexual crimes and victims' families

What was the name of the person whose murder case in 1992 highlighted issues with the "not proven" verdict?

• Sarah Jones

• Amanda Duffy

• Emily Smith

• Jessica Brown

What was the outcome for the man accused of killing Amanda Duffy?

• He was found guilty and imprisoned.

• He was found not guilty.

• He received an acquittal with a "not proven" verdict.

• His case was dismissed before trial.

How long had Amanda Duffy's family been fighting to scrap the "not proven" verdict?

• 10 years

• 20 years

• 30 years

• 40 years

What was the general attitude of the "establishment" towards scrapping the "not proven" verdict, according to Joe Duffy?

• They were very supportive from the beginning.

• They were indifferent to the campaign.

• They never wanted it and didn't want to hear about it.

• They actively campaigned for its removal.

What does Joe Duffy hope the new legal system will provide for juries?

• More complex verdict options.

• Less responsibility in decision-making.

• A clear, proper mandate for their operations.

• The ability to choose any verdict they wish.