Tokyo Court Approves Ghosn’s Bail

The transcript discusses the legal proceedings surrounding Cone's bail appeal, highlighting the possibility of new charges and the role of the prosecutor. It also explores the international dimension, with Cone's family appealing to the UN and Amnesty International raising concerns about Japan's pre-trial processes. Japan's sensitivity to UN decisions is noted, and the Mandela Rules on prisoner treatment are discussed, suggesting potential violations that could impact Japan's international standing.

What is the significance of Cone's third appeal for bail?

• It suggests a higher chance of bail approval.

• It indicates a final decision by the court.

• It means new charges have been laid.

• It shows the prosecutor's agreement.

Why did Cone's family approach the UN?

• To apply international pressure on Japan.

• To negotiate a plea deal.

• To seek asylum for Cone.

• To request a change in legal representation.

What concerns did Amnesty International raise?

• The length of Cone's detention.

• The lack of rules for pre-trial interrogations.

• The transparency of the legal process.

• The fairness of Cone's trial.

How does Japan's participation in the UN influence its legal decisions?

• Japan prioritizes its own legal system over the UN.

• Japan is sensitive to UN decisions.

• Japan is indifferent to international opinions.

• Japan often ignores UN recommendations.

What are the Mandela rules concerned with?

• The structure of international courts.

• The funding of the UN.

• The process of legal appeals.

• The rights of prisoners.