Interview with Priti Patel MP, Vote Leave Campaigner

The transcript discusses the financial figures related to the EU contributions, emphasizing the lack of control over these funds and the potential benefits of redirecting them to UK priorities like the NHS. It addresses the political perspectives on EU membership and the importance of taking back control of taxpayer money. The discussion also touches on the views of a prominent MP and the implications of their stance on the campaign.

What is the main point about the financial figure discussed in the campaign?

• It is a net figure.

• It is a gross figure showing money given to the EU.

• It is a misleading figure.

• It represents government money.

What is one of the proposed benefits of leaving the EU according to the campaign?

• Strengthening ties with the EU.

• Reducing local community funding.

• Taking back control of money given to the EU.

• Increasing taxes for the NHS.

How does the campaign suggest the reclaimed money could be used?

• Building new government offices.

• Investing in foreign aid.

• Funding the NHS and local priorities.

• Reducing national debt.

What is the campaign's response to Sarah's decision to leave?

• They express disappointment.

• They respect her view and emphasize financial control.

• They ignore her decision.

• They criticize her publicly.

What is the campaign's stance on the money given to the EU?

• It is well-controlled by the UK.

• It is a small amount.

• It is British taxpayers' money with no UK control.

• It is used for UK priorities.