Unfair Trial Just a Reality for Boston Bomb Suspect

The transcript discusses the challenges of ensuring a fair trial for those accused of heinous crimes, particularly in high-profile cases like that of Tsarnaev. It highlights the responsibilities of jurors to ensure a fair verdict and the difficulties in selecting an impartial jury, especially in areas directly affected by the crime. The defense argues that a fair trial is impossible in Boston due to local biases, and similar challenges exist across the Northeast and potentially the entire U.S. The process of jury selection is complex, with many potential jurors disqualified due to their proximity to the events.

What is a major concern for defense lawyers in high-profile cases?

• The length of the trial

• The lack of evidence

• Media influence on public opinion

• The cost of legal proceedings

Why do defense lawyers argue that a fair trial is impossible in Boston?

• The jury is too small

• The judge is biased

• The trial is too expensive

• The local jury may have preconceived notions

What is a potential issue with jury selection in the Northeast?

• Widespread media coverage affecting impartiality

• Insufficient courtroom facilities

• High travel costs for jurors

• Lack of qualified jurors

What makes jury selection particularly challenging in areas like Watertown?

• The language barrier

• The lack of available jurors

• The distance from the courthouse

• The jurors' personal experiences during the manhunt

Why might residents of Cambridge or Watertown be excluded from the jury?

• They are too far from the trial location

• They were under lockdown during the manhunt

• They are not registered voters

• They have no interest in the trial