Sadiq Khan Starts Inquiry Into London Stadium Cost

The video discusses the challenges of making the Olympic stadium viable for both athletics and football. It highlights financial issues, including the high cost of converting the stadium for West Ham's use and the taxpayer burden. The original plan to reduce the stadium's capacity was deemed economically unviable, leading to a costly compromise. The video also contrasts the stadium's legacy with the successful Aquatic Center, emphasizing missed opportunities and ongoing financial challenges.

What prompted London's mayor to order an investigation into the stadium?

• The stadium's seating capacity

• The rising cost of conversion

• The success of the Aquatic Center

• The retractable seats

What was the original plan for the stadium after the Olympics?

• A retractable seating arrangement

• A 60,000 seat multi-sport venue

• A permanent 25,000 seat athletic facility

• A football-only stadium

What financial issue is associated with the retractable seats?

• They are too expensive to install

• They cost up to £8 million to move each summer

• They are not retractable enough

• They are not suitable for athletics

What is the main contrast between the stadium and the Aquatic Center?

• The stadium is cheaper to maintain

• The stadium is more popular

• The Aquatic Center had a clear legacy plan

• The Aquatic Center is less used

What remains a distant goal for the stadium?

• Hosting international events

• Being a multi-sport venue

• Achieving a self-sustaining legacy

• Reducing seating capacity