Trump Doesn’t Want to Get Into a Military Fight With Iran, Says Professor Brands

Trump Doesn’t Want to Get Into a Military Fight With Iran, Says Professor Brands

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the Trump administration's maximum pressure strategy on Iran and North Korea, highlighting the differences and challenges in these approaches. It examines the contradictory nature of exerting pressure without engaging in military conflict and the impact of US sanctions on global markets. The video also explores the difficulties in negotiating with Iran, emphasizing the need for concessions to initiate talks.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key difference between the US strategies towards Iran and North Korea?

The strategy towards Iran is more international.

The strategy towards North Korea is more unilateral.

The strategy towards Iran is more unilateral.

The strategy towards North Korea involves no pressure.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common goal in the US strategies towards both Iran and North Korea?

To engage in military conflict.

To avoid economic sanctions.

To form international coalitions.

To exert significant pressure on the regimes.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has the US influenced other countries regarding sanctions on Iran?

By offering economic incentives.

By forming a new international coalition.

By threatening military action.

By forcing them to comply to maintain access to the US market.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might Iran be hesitant to enter negotiations with the US?

They prefer military conflict.

They seek a symbolic concession first.

They have no interest in diplomacy.

They have already agreed to all US terms.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What has been a significant revelation about US power in the Iran crisis?

US power is less significant than expected.

US power is more significant than many observers thought.

US power is only significant in military terms.

US power is irrelevant in economic matters.