Rep. McCaul on Repealing 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force

The transcript discusses the debate over the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), highlighting concerns about repealing it without a replacement, which could limit the President's ability to combat ISIS in Iraq. It covers the current proposals in the House and their uncertain future in the Senate, emphasizing the need for modernization. The discussion also touches on bipartisan support for revising the War Powers Act and the President's restraint in military actions, particularly in response to attacks on US assets.

What is a major concern if the 2002 AUMF is repealed without a replacement?

• The President would have no authority to attack ISIS in Iraq.

• The President would gain more power to attack Iran.

• The United Nations would take control of military operations.

• The military budget would increase significantly.

What happened to the proposals related to the AUMF in the National Defense Authorization Bill?

• They were approved with amendments.

• They were stripped out completely.

• They were passed unanimously.

• They were sent back for further review.

What is the main goal of the House Foreign Relations Committee regarding the AUMF?

• To transfer its powers to the United Nations.

• To increase its scope to include more countries.

• To modernize and update it.

• To repeal it entirely without replacement.

What message is being sent to the White House regarding the War Powers Act?

• The President should act more aggressively.

• The President is going too far, too fast.

• The War Powers Act should be repealed.

• The military should have more autonomy.

How did the President demonstrate restraint in military actions according to the transcript?

• By withdrawing troops from all foreign bases.

• By increasing military presence in Iraq.

• By deciding not to retaliate after a drone was shut down.

• By launching a preemptive strike on Iran.