Vince Cable, Liberal Democrat Chancellor, speech to the Liberal Democrat Party Conference 2009

Vince Cable, Liberal Democrat Chancellor, speech to the Liberal Democrat Party Conference 2009

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the speaker's views on spending priorities, advocating for more resources in sectors like mental health and education. It highlights the economic trade-offs involved in spending decisions and critiques political promises, particularly those of the Tories, exposing their significant spending commitments. The speaker warns against political cynicism and arrogance in handling public funds.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's view on spending money on areas like mental health and education?

They think it is important but acknowledge economic limitations.

They believe it should be avoided at all costs.

They believe it is unnecessary.

They think it should be the only focus of spending.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker compare politicians offering expensive freebies?

To cautious investors.

To responsible leaders.

To bankers with excessive bonuses.

To generous philanthropists.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's opinion on the Tories' approach to spending?

They are considered too lenient.

They are praised for their discipline.

They are criticized for their political cynicism.

They are seen as innovative.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What contradiction does the speaker point out about the Tories?

They support increased taxes but reduce public services.

They advocate for education but cut school budgets.

They promote healthcare but close hospitals.

They claim to cut spending but commit to massive extra spending.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's view on the arrogance of certain politicians?

They see it as a necessary trait for leadership.

They criticize it as a sign of overconfidence.

They think it is a sign of strength.

They believe it is justified.