CLEAN : Maasai representatives express frustration after losing right to dwell on ancestral homelands

The transcript discusses a legal case involving a community allegedly living inside a national park. The initial judgment claimed no forceful evictions or injuries occurred, but the opposing side presented evidence of property destruction and injuries. Dissatisfied with the judgment, they plan to appeal to the East African Court of Justice.

What did the court decide about the community's living situation?

• They were living in temporary shelters.

• They were living outside the park.

• They were living inside the park.

• They were living in a different country.

What did the court conclude about the evictions?

• There were forceful evictions.

• There was a loss of life.

• There was no loss of property.

• There were injuries reported.

What did the evidence and witnesses claim about the evictions?

• The community was compensated.

• Some Masai people were injured.

• The evictions were peaceful.

• There was no destruction of property.

What is the next step suggested by the applicants?

• Accept the court's decision.

• Relocate the community.

• Appeal to the Appellate Division.

• Seek compensation from the government.

How do the applicants feel about the court's judgment?

• Satisfied with the outcome.

• Indifferent to the decision.

• Hopeful for a resolution.

• Disappointed with the judgment.