Grenfell Tower as inquiry hears from Arconic managing director

The transcript discusses a person involved in financial transactions with RBC leaders, highlighting a payment of £250,000. It mentions a legal judgment that was overturned, indicating the person got the law wrong despite having a commercial law background. The discussion suggests the person should have been aware of the legal implications due to their expertise.

What does the speaker initially forget?

• The details of a legal case

• The name of a person

• Certain navies

• The amount of payment

Who paid £250,000 to the person mentioned?

• The market judgment committee

• A commercial law firm

• RBC leaders of the Council

• The victim

What happened to the market judgment?

• It was delayed

• It was ignored

• It was reversed and overturned

• It was upheld

What is the person's professional background?

• Criminal law

• Family law

• Commercial law

• Environmental law

Why should the person have known the law?

• Because they were a judge

• Due to their involvement in politics

• Because they were a law student

• Due to their role as Council for the victim