Prime Minister David Cameron Agrees EU Referendum Word Change

The transcript discusses the sudden change in the UK referendum question regarding EU membership, emphasizing the importance of legitimacy and fairness. It highlights the impact on campaigners, particularly those who assumed a different question format. Insights from the Scottish independence referendum are shared, noting the significance of wording. The role of the Electoral Commission in shaping the question and ensuring fairness is examined, along with David Cameron's strategies for EU reform.

What was the main reason for changing the referendum question regarding the UK's EU membership?

• To align with other countries' referendums

• To reduce campaign costs

• To ensure the referendum is seen as legitimate

• To simplify the voting process

Why did some campaigners feel disadvantaged by the original referendum question?

• It was not clear enough

• It was too complex for voters

• It was too similar to previous referendums

• It favored a positive response

What lesson was learned from the Scottish independence referendum regarding question phrasing?

• Negative phrasing is always more effective

• Positive phrasing can lead to a loss

• The phrasing does not impact the outcome

• Neutral phrasing is the best approach

What was the government's response to the Electoral Commission's recommendations?

• They accepted and planned to amend the bill

• They postponed the decision

• They rejected the recommendations

• They sought further consultation

What is David Cameron's strategy following the setting of the referendum question?

• To focus on domestic policies

• To engage with European leaders for reform

• To delay the referendum

• To launch a new campaign