Exporting Repression

The video discusses the controversial practice of memory repression therapy, which originated in the United States and spread globally, leading to false convictions. It highlights differences in social and legal policies across countries, with a focus on Sweden and the infamous Thomas Quick case. The video also explores the relationship between eyewitness and repressed memory cases, emphasizing the malleable nature of memory and the global dissemination of these ideas by North American mental health professionals.

What was the initial impact of memory repression therapy in the United States?

• It led to a series of false convictions.

• It improved the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies.

• It was quickly dismissed by legal professionals.

• It was only practiced in academic settings.

How do eyewitness cases differ from repressed memory cases?

• Eyewitness cases are more reliable.

• Repressed memory cases are less common.

• They both deal with the malleable nature of memory but are separate issues.

• Eyewitness cases are a recent phenomenon.

What was the role of North American mental health professionals in spreading memory repression therapy?

• They discouraged its use in other countries.

• They conducted studies to disprove its effectiveness.

• They were invited to speak about it in Europe and other regions.

• They only practiced it within the United States.

What was the outcome of Thomas Quick's case in Sweden?

• He was exonerated after it was revealed he was innocent.

• He was found guilty and remains in prison.

• His case was never resolved.

• He confessed to additional crimes.

What actions are being taken in Sweden regarding the Thomas Quick case?

• The case is being used to promote memory repression therapy.

• No actions are being taken.

• The case is being ignored by the media.

• Professional organizations are holding meetings to discuss the case.