Justice Stephen Breyer on Confirmation Process, Court Expansion

The transcript discusses the increasing political nature of court confirmations, contrasting past and present practices. It highlights the role of senators in reflecting constituents' views and the potential consequences of political affiliations on the process. Concerns about expanding the court's size are raised, emphasizing the need for caution. The discussion also touches on the perception of the court as political and its impact on public confidence.

What is the main concern about the current voting patterns in court confirmations?

• They are based on the nominee's popularity.

• They are decided by random selection.

• They are influenced by political affiliations.

• They are based on personal relationships.

According to the speaker, what is the role of Senators during the confirmation process?

• To prioritize their political party's agenda.

• To follow their personal beliefs.

• To represent the views of their constituents.

• To make decisions based on media influence.

What metaphor does the speaker use to describe their perspective on the confirmation process?

• A fish out of water.

• A recipe from the chicken's point of view.

• A ship without a captain.

• A puzzle missing pieces.

What is the speaker's view on expanding the size of the court?

• It is a necessary change.

• It will strengthen the court.

• It is irrelevant to the court's function.

• It should be done cautiously.

What is the potential risk of politicizing the court, according to the speaker?

• Greater political harmony.

• Weakened public trust in court decisions.

• More efficient decision-making.

• Increased public confidence.