‘Very difficult’ for deposit scheme to go ahead without glass – Yousaf

The transcript discusses the disagreement between the UK and Scottish Governments over the deposit return scheme (DRS). It highlights the issue of devolved competency and the potential competitive disadvantage for Scottish businesses. The speaker expresses frustration and the difficulty in finding a path forward for the DRS without including certain conditions. The future of the scheme is uncertain, pending a cabinet meeting.

What is the main issue causing disagreement between the UK and Scottish Governments?

• The scheme's implementation timeline

• The scheme's impact on the environment

• The financial cost of the scheme

• The legality of the deposit return scheme

Why is the speaker concerned about the deposit return scheme's impact on Scottish businesses?

• It could harm the environment

• It could create a competitive disadvantage

• It may lead to increased taxes

• It might reduce employment opportunities

What is the speaker's stance on implementing the deposit return scheme?

• They are against it due to environmental concerns

• They are fully supportive regardless of the impact

• They are indifferent to its implementation

• They support it only if it doesn't harm businesses

What is the speaker's prediction about the future of the deposit return scheme?

• It will be expanded to other regions

• It will definitely be implemented

• It will be scrapped if conditions aren't met

• It will be postponed indefinitely

What condition is crucial for the continuation of the deposit return scheme?

• Exclusion of certain business sectors

• Avoiding competitive disadvantages for businesses

• Inclusion of all UK regions

• Immediate implementation