CLEAN: UK announces torture inquiry

The transcript discusses the controversial policy of obtaining intelligence through torture, highlighting the involvement of senior officials and the pressure from the CIA on the British government to avoid inquiries. It questions the reliability of intelligence gained through torture, as it often leads to false information. The speaker shares a personal account of being informed about the policy and expresses skepticism about being allowed to testify openly. The transcript also touches on the connection between international studies and British intelligence practices.

What was the main concern of the American government regarding the British inquiry into torture?

• The inquiry might lead to policy changes.

• The inquiry could damage diplomatic relations.

• The inquiry would be too costly.

• The inquiry might reveal CIA's involvement.

Who were some of the key figures involved in the intelligence operations related to torture?

• Junior officers and analysts

• Ambassadors and senior MI5 and MI6 members

• Local police forces

• International human rights organizations

Why is intelligence obtained through torture considered unreliable?

• It is frequently false as people say anything to stop the torture.

• It is often outdated.

• It is usually incomplete.

• It is too expensive to obtain.

What did the ambassador expect regarding the inquiry into the use of torture for intelligence?

• It would be a whitewash.

• It would be thorough and transparent.

• It would be canceled.

• It would lead to policy changes.

What broader topic does the final section touch upon?

• International trade agreements

• British intelligence activities and their implications

• Environmental policies

• Technological advancements in intelligence