CLEAN : Sri Lankan Muslims decry government's burqa ban

CLEAN : Sri Lankan Muslims decry government's burqa ban

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Religious Studies, Moral Science

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the importance of allowing women, including Muslims, to choose their attire freely. It criticizes government-imposed dress codes as a violation of women's rights and highlights the ongoing oppression of Muslims in Sri Lanka, including forced cremations and bans on face coverings. The speaker emphasizes the need to view these actions as human rights violations.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's stance on women's right to choose their attire?

Only Muslim women should have the freedom to choose their attire.

Women should follow a government-imposed dress code.

Women should not be allowed to cover their faces.

Women should have the freedom to choose their attire.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What government action is mentioned as oppressive towards Muslims in Sri Lanka?

Prohibiting Muslims from attending schools.

Banning all religious practices.

Forcibly cremating Muslims and banning face coverings.

Forcing Muslims to change their names.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker view the ban on face coverings?

As a minor inconvenience.

As a necessary security measure.

As a violation of women's rights.

As a way to promote cultural unity.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the broader perspective the speaker urges regarding the rights of Muslims?

To view it as a cultural issue rather than a rights issue.

To ignore the issue as it is not significant.

To prioritize national security over individual rights.

To respect individual freedoms and view it as a human rights issue.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker imply about the government's actions towards Muslims?

They are justified and necessary.

They are a continuation of oppression.

They are beneficial for social harmony.

They are unrelated to human rights.