Government to get tough on private parking

The video discusses the issue of private parking charges, highlighting a case where a driver received a notice for parking on private land. The RAC Foundation argues that these charges are not fines but compensation for damages, and questions their legality. Statistics show a significant number of appeals against these charges, with many being successful. The parking industry body, BPA, calls for better regulation, while the RAC Foundation urges government intervention to protect motorists.

What was Pauline's initial assumption about the car park?

• It was only for short-term parking.

• It required a membership to park.

• It was free and belonged to the council.

• It was owned by a private company.

According to the RAC Foundation, what should the government do about private parking charges?

• Ignore the issue.

• Allow private firms to charge more.

• Stop private firms from charging so much.

• Increase the charges.

What is the primary reason given for parking charges on private land?

• To generate revenue for the government.

• To compensate for damages to the landowner.

• To fund local community projects.

• To discourage long-term parking.

What percentage of drivers have successfully appealed against parking fees since 2012?

• Almost one in two.

• One in four.

• Three in four.

• Almost all of them.

What is the stance of the BPA regarding the regulation of parking charges?

• They want to increase the charges.

• They accuse the government of not providing proper regulation.

• They support the RAC Foundation's view.

• They believe the current laws are sufficient.