Ralph Nader's Top Presidential Picks for 2016

Ralph Nader's Top Presidential Picks for 2016

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the idea of having a diverse range of candidates, including billionaires and individuals from various sectors, run for president. It highlights the potential benefits of such diversity, like increased credibility and a more competitive democracy. The speaker emphasizes the need for freedom of speech and new talent from different communities, advocating for a break from the traditional two-party system.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one reason the speaker supports billionaires running for President?

They have experience in international relations.

They are popular among young voters.

They can bring instant credibility and challenge the two-party system.

They have a lot of money to fund campaigns.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does the speaker mention Oprah Winfrey in the context of presidential candidates?

She represents the need for more female candidates.

She has a strong political background.

She has previously run for office.

She is a billionaire.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest is needed in the early months of a presidential campaign?

A focus on traditional values.

A focus on international policies.

A burst of freedom of speech and creativity.

A reduction in media coverage.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which communities does the speaker suggest should be considered for political talent?

The sports community.

The entertainment industry.

The academic, citizen action, and labor communities.

Only the business community.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What criticism does the speaker have about the current political talent pool?

It is too focused on young candidates.

It is too focused on technology experts.

It is too focused on international candidates.

It is limited and not diverse enough.