U.S. Says Court Has Power to Order Apple to Unlock iPhone

The transcript discusses the legal battle between the government and Apple over unlocking an iPhone. The government argues that Apple can comply with the court order using minimal resources, while Apple contends that doing so would create a 'master key' affecting all users. The case is seen as a precedent-setting example, with implications for privacy and security. Tech giants like Amazon and Google support Apple's stance against government overreach.

What is the government's main argument regarding Apple's ability to unlock the iPhone?

• It is a limited request for one phone.

• The request is for a universal backdoor.

• Apple has already complied with similar requests.

• Apple lacks the resources to comply.

How does Apple view the government's request to unlock the iPhone?

• As a way to improve their security systems.

• As a potential precedent for future cases.

• As a one-time request with no further implications.

• As a simple technical challenge.

What concern does Apple raise about complying with the court order?

• It would lead to increased sales.

• It would require hiring more employees.

• It would improve their public image.

• It would create a master key for all iPhones.

What is one reason the FBI and Justice Department might have chosen this specific case?

• To test new encryption technologies.

• To improve relations with Apple.

• To set a precedent in terrorism-related cases.

• To address a minor legal issue.

Which companies have shown support for Apple's stance against the government's request?

• Samsung, Sony, LG, Huawei

• Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft

• Intel, AMD, Nvidia, Qualcomm

• IBM, Oracle, SAP, Salesforce