CLEAN : Suu Kyi burying head in sand over Rakhine crisis: Amnesty

The transcript discusses the Myanmar government's inadequate response to the crisis in Rakhine State, highlighting the military's role in ethnic cleansing and the need for independent investigations. It critiques the government's use of discriminatory citizenship laws against the Rohingya, emphasizing the denial of their rights and the flawed processes that prevent their return and recognition as citizens.

What is the main criticism of the government's response to the situation in Rakhine State?

• They have fully acknowledged the military's role.

• They have invited independent investigators to assess the situation.

• They are accused of downplaying the situation and not acknowledging the military's role.

• They have taken immediate action to stop the abuses.

What is suggested as necessary for uncovering the truth about the events in Rakhine State?

• Relying on government reports.

• Allowing independent investigators to conduct their work.

• Inviting the diplomatic community to visit the area.

• Ignoring the situation entirely.

What is unclear about the government's plan for the return of displaced people?

• The financial support they will receive.

• The transportation arrangements for their return.

• The timeline for their return.

• Whether they will be allowed to return if they don't meet citizenship criteria.

What is a major issue with the 1982 citizenship law as applied to the Rohingya?

• It grants automatic citizenship to all residents.

• It is considered fair and inclusive.

• It has been applied consistently and without bias.

• It is deeply discriminatory and arbitrarily applied.

What outcome is unlikely if the current citizenship law is used in the verification process?

• Immediate peace in the region.

• Increased international support.

• A fair and just resolution for the Rohingya.

• A boost in economic development.