Why Renault Flagged Ghosn's Versailles Wedding for Possible Misconduct

The transcript discusses Renault's willingness to oppose Carlos Ghosn's activities, highlighting the strategy of portraying him as an extravagant executive. It explores the potential misuse of corporate funds for a lavish wedding at Versailles, emphasizing the media's role in shaping public perception. The discussion also covers the power dynamics between Nissan and Renault, focusing on the influence each company has in determining Nissan's leadership.

What was the strategy of Nissan and the prosecutors regarding Carlos Ghosn?

• To support his leadership

• To portray him as a responsible executive

• To depict him as an out-of-control executive

• To ignore his activities

What could be disastrous for Carlos Ghosn according to the first section?

• A new business strategy

• Support from Renault

• A lack of media coverage

• A direct link between his wedding and corporate funds

Why is the wedding at Versailles significant in the media narrative?

• It was a simple ceremony

• It was held in a different country

• It was a small private event

• It symbolizes opulence and extravagance

What is the main point of contention between Nissan and Renault?

• The appointment of Nissan's chairman

• The color of the company logo

• The design of a new car model

• The location of the headquarters

How much stake does Renault hold in Nissan, giving it significant influence?

• 25%

• 43%

• 50%

• 60%