Shutdown Talks a 'Total Fiasco' and a Plus for Bonds, Valliere Says

Shutdown Talks a 'Total Fiasco' and a Plus for Bonds, Valliere Says

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the incentives for House Democrats to cooperate with the White House on issues like the government shutdown and NAFTA. It explores the potential declaration of a national emergency by President Trump, its implications, and the impact on bonds. The discussion also covers the concerns of Republicans about setting a precedent and the breakdown of talks related to immigration and the border wall.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the potential consequences for both parties if they fail to cooperate on issues like the shutdown?

They will be praised for standing their ground.

They will be seen as equally responsible for the fiasco.

They will gain more support from their base.

They will successfully pass their agendas.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How can a national emergency be used by a president?

To change the Constitution.

To bypass Congress and redirect funds.

To declare war on another country.

To appoint new Supreme Court justices.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a concern among Republicans regarding the declaration of a national emergency?

It will result in immediate impeachment.

It will strengthen the Democratic Party.

It could set a precedent for future presidents.

It might lead to increased taxes.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main issues causing the breakdown of talks to avoid a government shutdown?

The reduction of healthcare benefits.

The number of beds available for immigrants.

The allocation of funds for education.

The increase in military spending.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is Trump unlikely to accept the deal regarding the border wall?

It provides too much funding for the wall.

It is perceived as too generous for immigrants.

It is considered too stingy for the border wall.

It includes provisions for climate change action.