CLEAN : 'We won't keep quiet': protest outside high court in London against Rwanda deportations

CLEAN : 'We won't keep quiet': protest outside high court in London against Rwanda deportations

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

10th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the UK government's handling of asylum seekers, highlighting the unsafe conditions they are subjected to and the opposition to these actions. It criticizes the government's approach as a form of reverse colonialism and trafficking, emphasizing the need for legal pathways for asylum seekers. The speaker calls for action against these practices, advocating for human rights and equality.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main criticism of the UK system's handling of asylum seekers?

It allows them to choose their country of relocation.

It offers them immediate citizenship.

It relocates them to unsafe areas.

It provides too much support to asylum seekers.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How is the relocation of people to Rwanda described in the video?

As a form of reverse colonialism and trafficking.

As a voluntary relocation scheme.

As a humanitarian effort.

As a successful integration program.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the video suggest is lacking in the government's approach to asylum seekers?

A legal room for assessment.

Immediate deportation policies.

Financial support for all asylum seekers.

A focus on economic benefits.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the focus of the ongoing fight mentioned in the video?

Improving economic conditions.

Achieving equality and human rights.

Expanding detention centers.

Increasing government control.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What strategy is being used to challenge the current system according to the video?

Organizing within detention centers.

Supporting government policies.

Relying on existing institutions.

Ignoring the issue.