Politicians ‘eagerly await’ results of constituency boundary review

Politicians ‘eagerly await’ results of constituency boundary review

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses expectations for the upcoming election, the role of the Electoral Commission, and the potential need for constitutional amendments regarding representation. It emphasizes the importance of an independent system and the value of direct contact with representatives. The speaker expresses reluctance to change a system that has served well since the state's foundation.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's attitude towards the expected changes in Mayo?

They are worried about significant changes.

They expect minimal changes.

They are indifferent to any changes.

They believe changes will be drastic.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker suggest dealing with outcomes from the Electoral Commission?

By protesting against unfavorable decisions.

By ignoring the Commission's decisions.

By accepting and implementing the decisions.

By seeking legal action against the Commission.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's view on the role of the Electoral Commission?

It often makes biased decisions.

It should be more controlled by the government.

It is crucial for independent adjudication.

It is unnecessary and should be abolished.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential change is being considered regarding the Constitution?

Decreasing the number of TDs per population.

Capping the population per TD.

Increasing the number of TDs per population.

Removing the cap on population per TD.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the speaker hesitant to change the current representation system?

It has been ineffective historically.

It has provided good representation since the state's foundation.

It is too costly to change.

It is unpopular among constituents.