CLEAN : Torture praising politicians words lamentable: Rousseff

CLEAN : Torture praising politicians words lamentable: Rousseff

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses various topics, starting with the concept of divine homes. It then moves to a financial example involving billions and the necessity of coverage. The discussion shifts to political matters, including a question about deputies and public perception. The video also addresses prejudice against a young deputy named Bruni. Finally, it reflects on historical events, focusing on a notorious torturer in Brazil's history and the implications of honoring such figures.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of the 'two billion and a half' mentioned in the first section?

It represents a large financial transaction that needed coverage.

It is the budget for a new educational program.

It is the cost of a new government project.

It is a metaphor for a small amount of money.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main topic of discussion regarding the deputies in the second section?

Their involvement in a financial scandal.

Their actions of taking photos with carnages.

Their participation in a new legislative session.

Their support for a new educational reform.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who is Bruni, as mentioned in the second section?

A historical figure from the 1970s.

A financial expert.

A famous Brazilian singer.

A new deputy from Minas Gerais.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the historical significance of the person discussed in the third section?

He was a renowned Brazilian artist.

He was one of the greatest torturers in Brazil's history.

He was a famous political leader.

He was a celebrated author.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's opinion on the homage paid to the torturer mentioned in the third section?

The speaker finds it honorable.

The speaker supports it.

The speaker is indifferent.

The speaker finds it lamentable.