CLEAN : Brazilian lawmakers react to Cunhas suspension

The transcript discusses the legal proceedings involving Eduardo Cunha, focusing on the Supreme Court's decision to remove him from his mandate. It highlights the judiciary's interference in legislative matters due to aggressive and illegal behavior within the house. The decision is seen as a historic moment for Brazilian citizenship and the Republic, emphasizing that parliamentary mandates should not protect those who commit crimes. The decision weakens Cunha's perceived unlimited power, reinforcing the limits of law and justice.

What was the main reason for involving a lawyer in the decision-making process?

• To ensure a timely resolution

• To delay the decision

• To avoid legal consequences

• To gather more evidence

Why did the judiciary interfere in the legislative process?

• To support the legislative decisions

• To address aggressive and illegal conduct

• To promote new laws

• To protect the parliamentarians

What was the outcome of the Supreme Court's decision regarding Eduardo Cunha?

• He was removed from his mandate

• He was given a warning

• He was promoted to a higher position

• He was fined

What message did the Supreme Court's decision convey about parliamentary mandates?

• They should be used to obstruct investigations

• They should not shield individuals from accountability

• They should guarantee impunity

• They should protect individuals from accountability

How did the decision affect Eduardo Cunha's perceived power?

• It increased his power

• It had no effect on his power

• It limited his power

• It made his power seem unlimited