VOICED : Ukraines nationalist

The transcript discusses issues of protocol manipulation and election fraud in Ukraine, highlighting the government's alleged attempts to alter election results in four districts. It mentions the government's defeat in Kyiv, suggesting broader implications for the state. The speaker hints at potential radical actions and the growth of a political faction, comparing it to the communists. The transcript concludes with a discussion on the party's identity and its perception by international organizations.

What issue is highlighted in the first section regarding the election protocols?

• The protocols were lost.

• The protocols were ignored.

• The protocols were delayed and data was distorted.

• The protocols were perfectly handled.

What is the potential reaction to the election manipulations mentioned in the second section?

• Ignoring the issue.

• Accepting the manipulated results.

• Taking more radical and decisive actions.

• Celebrating the results.

What is the significance of the political faction mentioned in the second section?

• It is a temporary faction.

• It is one of the largest and most powerful factions.

• It has no influence.

• It is smaller than the communist faction.

How is the political party 'Svoboda' described in the third section?

• As a non-xenophobic and non-communist party.

• As a communist party.

• As a radical party.

• As a xenophobic party.

What impact did 'Svoboda' have on international organizations according to the third section?

• It had no impact.

• It was criticized by international organizations.

• It was ignored by international organizations.

• It was recognized by many international organizations.