Anselm & the Argument for God: Crash Course Philosophy

The video explores the philosophy of religion, distinguishing it from theology by emphasizing that philosophy does not assume God's existence. It discusses Anselm's ontological argument, which claims God's existence is provable by defining God as the greatest conceivable being. Critiques from Guanilo and Kant highlight flaws in Anselm's reasoning, such as the fallacy of begging the question and the idea that existence is not a predicate. The parable of the invisible gardener illustrates ongoing philosophical debates about God's existence.

What is the significance of the statement 'no area of belief is sacred' in the context of philosophical inquiry?

What does the parable of the invisible gardener illustrate about the debate over God's existence?

How does the text suggest that both Guanilo and Kant agree with Anselm's conclusion despite their criticisms?