Supreme Court Shields LGBT Workers From On-Job Bias in Landmark Decision

The Supreme Court has ruled that firing someone based on sexual orientation or gender identity is illegal under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This decision marks a significant change in U.S. culture and politics, following years of activism and litigation. While this ruling provides a new legal avenue for employees, challenges remain due to forced arbitration clauses. The decision is celebrated by advocates, including business leaders like Jim Fitterling, and highlights the personal stories of plaintiffs like Amy Stevens, who fought for these rights.

What ongoing advocacy is suggested by Jim Fitterling following the ruling?

What was the personal impact of the ruling on individuals like Amy Stevens?