Supreme Court Says Unanimous Verdict Rule Is Not Retroactive

The High Court ruled that split juries are not automatically entitled to new trials, requiring unanimous verdicts in state criminal trials. Justice Kavanaugh noted this aligns with longstanding retroactivity proceedings. However, Justice Kagan highlighted concerns that those convicted under unfair rules may lack federal recourse.

What is the significance of the term 'split juries' in the context of this ruling?

What does the ruling mean for those convicted under certain rules?