CLEAN : Kosovo politician Veseli denies war crimes charges

The transcript discusses a prosecutor's unprecedented action of issuing a statement before a court decision. The prosecutor attempts to justify his actions and alleges obstruction of specialized chambers. The doubts raised are deemed baseless, and there is concern over the use of false language. Additionally, there is suspicion that the prosecutor's true motives are entirely political.

What is unusual about the prosecutor's action?

• The prosecutor's statement was confirmed by the court.

• The prosecutor did not issue any statement.

• The prosecutor issued a statement after the court's decision.

• The prosecutor issued a statement before the court's decision.

What does the prosecutor claim in his statement?

• That he has no involvement in the case.

• That he and the president attempted to interfere with the court's work.

• That the charges are confirmed by the court.

• That the court has dismissed all charges.

What is the nature of the doubts raised about the prosecutor's claims?

• They are confirmed by the court.

• They are partially true.

• They are completely unfounded.

• They are based on solid evidence.

What is suggested about the prosecutor's motives?

• They are driven by public opinion.

• They are based on personal vendetta.

• They are entirely political.

• They are purely legal.

What is the prosecutor accused of in terms of his language?

• Using factual language.

• Using misleading language.

• Using supportive language.

• Using neutral language.